QUOTE (Stevesy. @ Jul 9 2009, 12:39 AM)

First off: I'm not saying it's your infowar. Because it's not. I was just using an Alex Jones term.
There are agendas in government, there always have been. I just think if the government really wanted to take us over, they wouldn't go to great lengths for over 50 years just to get this done. How hard would it have been to do it in the 60's and 70's when everyone was stoned off their ass? I believe evil exists in the world, but I refuse to believe that there were some people pulling the strings back when Kennedy was assassinated that still have this legacy to fulfill without ONE person with an ounce of good blowing the whistle. That's what checks and balances are for.
i know its not my infowar, erhm i think everyone figured that out when i first posted www.infowars.com i was just phrasing it the way you spoke of it. i believe that they would go to great lengths, in fact i believe that stalin and lenin were social experiments, to see how it would work off paper. it's not something they can just snap their fingers into. when people were stoned off their ass they were more in touch with themselves and it would've been incredibly hard to do. there were less mindless people back then. now that they have the public good and numb, and occupied with trivial meaningless pop culture. tv is a staple now, and people hardly even sit down for family dinners anymore. i'd say now would be the time to strike. they know what they are doing, and they are good at it. make no mistake, the things that happen in this world are not mere coincidence. it has to be gradual and as for kennedy, you cant tell me you really believe the lone gunman story? or the magic bullet? what are your thoughts on 911??
QUOTE
Let's pretend for a second that this is actually happening. Think of the number of people involved. Think of the tiny little slip ups. There have to be so many people involved with all of these master sinister plans, by now there would have been at least ONE person with a significant enough amount of power along with good in their souls to stop this from happening. A martyr of sorts. I just really don't think that this can all go flawlessly, and if this really is happening, something will stop it. Call it blind optimism, I call it sense.
there are TONS of slip ups, even presidents admitting that they exist and will persist! i know more than they'd like me to know. apparently even you know more than they'd like you to know. and you cant be serious about not being able to keep a secret. the skull n bones society is quite good at keeping secrets. i mean this isnt little league or the highschool cafeteria it's serious business and im pretty sure they also target people with things to hide. in skull n bones initiations, part of it is divulging your biggest secret. why do you think that is? why is it that every year out of the millions of people in the US it almost always comes down to 15 skull and bones members for president? but on top of that, they have plausible deniability and know that even when you tell people they wont believe it. so what are they really worried about? i mean henry kissinger openly says he wants a new world order. obama talks about a one world order, along with gordon brown. they really believe it's what's best. they dont hide it. tons of things leak.. read this thread, i post them.
QUOTE
I've watched EVERY film that you've mentioned. Believe me, I am very interested in this stuff, I just don't think that it will ever be taken to that extreme. They are all sensationalized. They're fear mongering. They're propaganda in and of themselves. Zeitgeist and The Obama Deception are two of the most sensationalized films I've ever seen. They aren't based as documentaries or simply factual, they are dark, they play creepy music, they have cute little gimmicks, and they blow off any existing counterpoint. They're good to watch, and I think that everyone should sit through the entire Obama Deception just to make up their own minds, but there are people who take every little piece of this as fact and I think that's sad. What these films do is take facts and then distort them to fit their agenda. I'm not denying that this film is full of facts that you can read up on Google. These people who make these films are very well read, very well researched, and have very interesting theories. But as of right now, that's all they are. Theories. They're taking things into their own context and finding an answer. That's fine, but there is a reason that there is a scientific difference between theory and law. These guys push the envelope and offer nothing but fear and a need for revolution and exposure. They are the very definition of sensationalized.
I guess I'm in the boat that refuses to believe we're all pawns. Living in fear is no way to live, my man. Have faith, stay educated, and cover your own ass.
first of all, there are a lot of movies i posted with none of that. (naomi wolfe, money masters, zero, any of the lectures) none of the creepy music, none of the cutesy gimmicks. and as far as the films that do present the info in such a manner, that's intentional. like i said, they are using the other teams playbook. they know what works. the point is not the film, the point is the subject matter i dont think you can fault them for taking a media type approach. it's what you're used to.. they want to fit it in the same type of programming. when u hear spooky music on 20/20 no one says boo about it. thats the trend in media these days.. it shouldnt take away from the message. it's for the people who rely on that sort've thing. and you say people of our movement distort facts to fit our agenda? LIKE WE WANT THESE THINGS TO BE TRUE? it doesnt help me sleep at night, i promise. if that's the case show me how i'm wrong? i dont take every little thing as fact.. but a lot of it IS fact, and you dont hear about garbage from me, cause i wont post it if its nonsense. i hear ya on the fear mongering thing a bit, but again that chalks back to what's affective. i'm not defending that approach, but i'm just saying it's effective. what's more important? the means or the end?
i agree to have faith and stay educated but i dont agree on just covering my own ass. i feel obligated to warn the people. they have to know! i really am hopeful that the people will snap out of it. i'm hopeful of this audit the fed bill. i'm full of hope and faith, and i cant stop trying to get educated. i wish i was on the middle ground with you.. but i cant, i wish i didnt know the half of it. ignorance is bliss, but i cant live that way either. i'd rather grin and bear it than pretend its something its not. and the films are not my only source, books are great too. there is proof of elite and their bloodlines, their is proof of the bankers, why act like they couldnt succeed. they dont need millions of people. just a few hundred key players. its the pyramid. and doesnt only apply to the new world order, its how freemasons operate, its how the illuminati operate.. it's even how the church operates. the fact that it cant be done i think is your weakest argument. but you do make valid points and im jealous that you can remain so level about all of it. i dont live in fear, but i recognize the threat. it gets me down sometimes but that's natural i think. people that believe al-qeda is out to get them, are living in fear. the people that believe the media whores are living in fear.
anyway, great posts. keep em coming.. i dont mind opposition to my position, so long as its not blind opposition which is most of what i deal with around here. so you're a nice change,l maybe you can change my mind? (doubtful) but healthy to exercise the thought. i'm open to your views of it. bring me to center!